High school students first
The first edition is being designed primarily for high school students across Hangzhou.
A cross-school AI product hackathon for high school students, planned for Hangzhou. The format below is a working plan — not a confirmed schedule.
This page describes an event in development. It is deliberately specific about what is not yet known.
A hackathon is a short, intensive build. Teams start with a problem, make decisions under a deadline and leave with a working prototype and evidence of what they learned.
It is not a lecture, a course or a slideshow. The point is to make something a person can try.
A working path matters more than a polished deck. The demo is the argument.
Explain the decisions, the dead ends and what changed your mind along the way.
Every team should leave with a specific next step, whether or not the prototype worked.
Planning target / Not confirmed
Planning range for the first edition. Capacity will be confirmed only after the venue, safety and approvals are settled.
The first edition is being designed primarily for high school students across Hangzhou.
Teams should be able to form across schools. Final eligibility and school scope are still being defined.
You do not need a finished idea. You need to want to make a product, not only watch one being made.
Designers, researchers, writers and organisers make products better. The room should include them.
Teams are planned at 2–4 people. One person can hold more than one role; the point is that the product gets more than one perspective before the deadline.
Product
What are we making?
Build
Does it run?
Design
Can someone use it?
Story
Can someone understand it?
2–4 people
Planning figure, not a confirmed rule.
Product, build, design, story
One person can hold more than one role.
Solo participants may be matched
Subject to final rules and available teams.
Everyone explains their part
The demo should make individual contribution visible.
Pre-built code must be disclosed
Reusing public libraries is allowed; presenting old work as new is not.
Two daytime days
No overnight build is planned.
A strict build, shaped around daylight. Exact times, check-in process and guardian requirements will be published with the final rules and the confirmed venue.
No overnight build
Check-in, safety briefing, team formation and the opening.
Problem, user, scope. Decide what you will not build.
Get the first working path running end to end.
Risks, blockers and the remaining plan, with mentors.
Back up, check devices and sign out. The room closes.
Network and repository check. Restore the last working version.
Real feedback, failure cases and debugging. Cut scope if needed.
Protect the core user path. No new features after the freeze.
Repository, README, demo, AI usage disclosure and backup.
A short product demo, followed by judges' questions.
Not a completed MVP
Slides, a video or a static design.
A prototype has to do something. The demo can be small; it cannot be imaginary.
MVP minimum
It takes an input and returns an output someone can see.
You can explain where the model does the work and why it is needed.
Someone else can follow the setup and use it without you.
Handle the obvious failure case — or demonstrate it clearly.
Submission checklist
The final submission list will be published with the rules.
A proposed rubric, published here so teams can see what matters before they build. Final rules, judges and recognition may change.
Also assessed
Individual contribution, a declared use of pre-built code and respect for the rules. Judges with a conflict of interest must step away from that team.
A specific user, a real need, evidence of response.
The MVP runs on the day. The main path is intact.
Where AI is needed, how it fails, what was traded away.
A distinct approach, not an API wrapper with a logo.
Clear demo, honest limits, a credible next step.
Recognition format will be published with the final rules. Award structure depends on regulatory review. No certificate, prize or ranking is confirmed on this page.
A high-school event cannot run on enthusiasm instead of responsibility. These conditions come before the schedule, the sponsors or the demo.
No overnight build. Participants leave the venue at the end of each day.
Participants under 18 will need guardian consent and a clear sign-in / sign-out process.
A published standard for behaviour, reporting and consequences — for everyone in the room.
Age-appropriate, lawful tools only. AI usage must be disclosed in the submission.
Minimum collection, restricted access and explicit permission for photographs.
Two network paths, a charging plan and an offline demo backup for every team.
Position on official status
HackMeld is not presented as an official national competition. Cross-school scope, competition status, awards and recognition will be reviewed with the relevant local authorities and adult safeguarding leads before any public claim is made. We will not sell certificates or imply an endorsement that does not exist.
No question is answered with a claim we cannot support. If something is not settled, it says so.
Registration is not open. Read the plan, check what is confirmed, and come back when the rules and dates are real.
No sign-up form is live. When registration opens, the confirmed link will be published here first.